Time is only a node of our perception.  How can quantum computing allow two things to exist in different places at the same time.  The riddle of this is that when measured (captured) we are artificially slicing the flow of time, which creates the illusion of measurement ‘creating’ reality.  This is not the case, our methods of measurement are limited in their ability to record the layers and levels of time movement.  Time flows back and forth like sound waves that echo off of some events.  Most of us only perceive each node sequentially at each point of perception.  So a measurement is like a point on a graph, the conventional definition of time is a slice of the shape on the graph and the reality of time is more like the entire multi-dimensional shape of all points on the graph.  Or think of a drop of water in a wave on a beach.  If I use a spoon to measure the wave, I will believe that the wave has no ebb and flow and will not be able to explain the tide.

I somehow seems to have glimpses of something that could be quantum awareness.  I somehow catch echoes of future events not perceived as sound or images.  The echos are more like thoughts that are out of synch with the flow of my usual perceptions.  I have described it as a stream which flows usually in one direction and occasionally something falls in, which creates ripples in my awareness.  The bigger the event or the closer in proximity, the bigger the disruption.  I tend to think of my normal perception of time like a trajectory.  I just happen to be headed this way, so from my perspective time also flows this way.  So then the echoes that bounce back at me are perceived to be the future.  My past is only the stuff I have stored regarding my perceptions.

So what about the progression of events that we normally refer to as time.  I think they may be overlapping layers that are perception slices, which we then peel away to see the progression.  Much as a photo is to a movie.  In traditional film, the images never truly move.  We perceive them to move as they flash by too quickly for us to see as separate images.  So our brain stitches them together in a continuous fluid whole illusion.  These time layers that we swim through are then in proximity to each other stacked together.  Our memory is the process of recording layers we have already experienced.   However, just as a film never truly captures all the information of the scene, our perception and measurement never fully captures the reality of ebb and flow of time.

The future is then dimly available to us as layers that our perception can glimpse through the noise or filter of the current perceptive and experiential process.  That is why those with quieter minds can perceive more of the future.  The future travels out from us in all directions like a ripple.  All directions are all possible permutations of the future.  Some futures have obstacles which shorten or repel the wave.  My awareness of future events seems to be directly related to the proximity in time, space and emotional magnitude (personal impact).  I have experienced some features that are not personally relevant to me, but I was crossing the exact location less than 24 hours in advance of the event.  So the weight of the two factors seem to reach critical mass, even though the event would not happen to me personally.  Our expectations of reality and our emotional need for certainty also affect our ability to accept what we perceive.  This idea would suggest that all time is not available to us equally from all nodes. Since we inhabit one current frame of reference or node-set, we can’t interact with those that are many layers away usually.  one exception may be DMT?  What about time slips?  Could some event cause the layers to shuffle briefly then go back to the normal order?

If time has a spectrum, we must then have a perceptive range to our time sense.  Just as we see the middle of the visual spectrum or what we define as the middle based on our frame of reference, but not the extremes, our time sense is focused on the current node of perception.  The past and the future are the extremes of the range which to us seem out of focus normally.